One of the most common pieces of writing advice you’ll hear is this: Trust your reader.
Don’t overexplain. Don’t spell out every emotion. For the love of the stars, don’t connect every dot. Give your audience enough credit to participate in the story.
I believe that with my whole chest.
But lately I’ve been thinking about the other side of that relationship.
Readers have to trust writers, too.
Recently, a writing friend read the opening chapters of one of my works-in-progress and suggested I move several pieces of information much earlier in the manuscript because they had questions.
At first, I wondered if they were right. Then I realized something.
Every one of those questions was answered.
Just…not yet.
It reminded me of one of my favorite Sheldon Cooper moments from The Big Bang Theory. He’s reading a scientific paper and keeps stopping to ask, “Why?” Frustrated, he turns the page—only to discover the paper answers the very question he just asked.
Sometimes the answer is on the next page.
Stories work the same way.
Readers are supposed to have questions. Why did they react that way? Why are they so guarded? What aren’t they saying?
Those questions aren’t signs that a story is broken. They’re often the very reason we keep reading.
That’s different from confusion.
If a reader genuinely can’t follow what’s’s happening, that’s on me as the writer.
But if they’re asking a question I’ve intentionally planted because the answer comes three chapters—or thirty chapters—later, that’s not a flaw.
It’s a promise.
I found myself thinking about this while revising Emergency Contacts.
In Sofie’s opening chapter, she says something that feels like it should explain everything about her. If you stopped reading there, you’d probably assume you’ve identified her deepest wound.
You haven’t.
You’ve only found the first layer.
Adam is the same way. Early on, he remembers something that seems to explain why he’s pursuing medicine. It feels foundational.
Until you spend more time with him and he trusts you enough to tell you more.
Because that’s how people actually work.
Share
When you meet someone for the first time, they don’t hand you a neatly organized timeline of every defining moment in their life. They don’t begin with their deepest heartbreak or the experience that fundamentally changed who they are.
They tell you what they’re ready to tell you.
Relationships are built in layers. The more trust exists, the more truth gets revealed.
I think stories should work the same way.
As writers, we’re often told to trust our readers. I would argue readers have to trust writers, too.
Trust that an unanswered question isn’t necessarily an oversight. Trust that not every motivation belongs in Chapter One. And that a character can say something completely true without it being the whole truth.
There’s a difference between withholding information to manufacture suspense and revealing information the way human beings actually reveal themselves.
The first feels manipulative. The second feels like falling in love with a character.
Of course, critique partners are invaluable. Sometimes they point out genuine confusion. Sometimes we’ve buried something too deeply or failed to establish enough context. That’s part of the revision process.
But sometimes the question they’re asking is exactly the question the story intends them to ask.
Often, it’s not because the author forgot the answer. It’s just that the answer hasn’t been earned yet.
As readers, we often ask writers to trust us. Maybe we should return the favor.
Sometimes the next page is exactly where the answer is waiting.
Leave a comment